Advisory checklist

The advisory checklist specifies the criteria against the three types of specialist report:

  • Type 1: Description - for relatively insignificant assemblages
  • Type 2: Appraisal - where there is the potential for further work
  • Type 3: Full analysis - following detailed analysis of significant assemblages

Table definitions:

  • X - include this
  • O - include this if possible or appropriate

 

Overall Project Report 1 2 3

Quantification of overall site assemblage by category, eg coins, pottery, iron, animal bone, charcoal (as minimum tabulated by weight for bulk finds/enviro, item count for registered finds)

X X X

Description of recovery strategy, eg hand collection, bulk sample derived, metal detector

X X X

Description of excavation sampling strategy

X X X

Description of selection strategy

X X X

Location of final archive (digital and physical) including repository accession number

X X X

Interpretation of the overall material assemblage, incorporating discussion of the local and wider context and the evidence from the site as a whole

X X X

 

     
Specialist Report (material or object categories, eg animal bone; coins)      
Document information 1 2 3

Title of report incorporating subject and project name

X X X

Name of author (including qualifications)

X X X

Date of data collection/recording

X X X

Date of analysis/report completion

X X X
Introduction 1 2 3

Summary of the nature of the assemblage and its significance

X X X

Overall size of assemblage (eg total count and weight)

X X X

Aims of the report

X X X

Description of recovery strategy, eg hand collection, bulk samples derived, metal detector

X X X

Description of environmental sampling strategy (if relevant)

X X X

Summary of relevant context information/feature types (avoiding repetition of stratigraphic narrative)

X X X

Range of dates/periods/phases represented in the assemblage

X X X
Methodology 1 2 3

Description of methods of study: methods of both identification and quantification

X X X

Reference methods of study to existing and appropriate standards

X X X

Identification of formal reference/research collections or type series used during recording, eg physical type series, online type series, environmental collections

X X X

Reference to use of source material/bibliographic resources/thesaurus during recording, eg published corpus

X X X

Concordance of codes/abbreviations and their meanings

X X X

Description of any scientific analysis carried out

X X X

Description of archive products of the recording process

X X X

Description of selection of the assemblage for archive

X X X
Quantification 1 2 3

Quantification of assemblage category overall by an appropriate method, eg individual object count, fragment count or weight (eg number of coins; quantities of bone; quantities of pottery)

X X X

Higher-level quantification by an appropriate method (eg Estimated Vessel Equivalent (EVE), Minimum Number of Vessels (MNV), Minimum Number of Individuals (MNI), Number of Identified Specimens (NISP))

    X
Characterisation 1 2 3

Material classified to an appropriate level: eg glass/colourless glass; stone/limestone/oolitic limestone; pottery/earthenware/Malvern ware; animal bone/large mammal/sheep; charcoal/oak; slag/iron slag/smithing slag

X X X

Objects classified at basic level, eg coin, brooch, jar, scraper, tibia

X X X

Objects classified at detailed level, eg denarius, bow brooch, globular jar, thumbnail scraper, left tibia

O O X

Artefacts classified by diagnostic components, eg variation of rims, brooch plates, obverse/reverse of coins

  O X

Artefact descriptions include specific details, eg decoration, surface treatment, eg incised, glazed, burnished, stamped

  X X

Description of condition and/or completeness, eg levels of abrasion, brokenness, wear, count of fragments, burnt

O X X

Description of condition in relation to taphonomic processes of deposition and preservation (especially for ecofacts/environmental remains)

    X

Description of evidence of use/alteration, eg burning, sooting, wear patterns, butchery marks, adze marks, repair, residues and limescale

  X X

Description of manufacture/technology, eg method of manufacture/feature of manufacture (such as thread count)

  X X
Integration of results of scientific analysis (chemical composition; geological character) O X X
Significance, potential and recommendations 1 2 3

Statement of significance and potential of material/assemblage

X X  

Statement of contribution of material/assemblage to project research aims

O X X

Statement of new material/assemblage-led research aims

  X  

Recommendation for further recording and analysis

  X  

Recommendation for illustration

O X  
Contextualisation 1 2 3
Discussion of assemblage in relation to contextual information X X X
Discussion of assemblage in relation to chronological sequence, character of site, function of features, site formation processes     X
Interpretation 1 2 3

Detailed discussion of assemblage in its own terms, eg relative proportions of different types, of different dates

X X X

Discussion of assemblage in relation to excavated evidence

O X X
Discussion of assemblage in relation to chronological sequence, character of site, function of features, site formation processes   O X
Discussion of the assemblage as evidence for the way of life as represented at the site over time     X

Integrated discussion with other evidence from the site to explore aspects such as site/feature morphology, site function and socio-economic context

    X

Discussion of the assemblage in local, regional and wider context, in relation to other site assemblages, to explore economic and social context, eg trade, supply, distribution, consumption

    X
Presentation 1 2 3

Presentation of quantified data in standardised form, eg appropriate use of graphs/tables

X X X

Presentation of quantified data, related to context/structural sequence/phasing

  X X
Presentation of detailed characterisation data (eg fabric/ware types) to context/structural sequence/phasing     X

Presentation of descriptive information in standardised forms, eg tables

O X X

Presentation of scientific data in accessible form, eg tables, plots, graphs

  X X

Catalogue (as a minimum all illustrated items should be accompanied by a catalogue) including standardised description of object/item as appropriate to find type, eg context, descriptor, condition, completeness, count, weight, dimensions, stratigraphic group/feature

X   X

Illustration; through drawing, photography, x-radiographs, digital imaging

X   X

Bibliography

X X X

Acknowledgements

X X X